Samsung Galaxy A52 5G vs. Google Pixel 4a 5G: What’s the best 5G phone under $500?
Samsung Galaxy A52 5G vs. Google Pixel 4a 5G: What's the best 5G phone under $500?
When y'all have the new Samsung Galaxy A52 5G go upwardly against the Google Pixel 4a 5G in a head-to-caput battle, the last event turns out to exist razor thin — simply what you'd wait from 2 Android phones that take a lot in common.
The Google Pixel 4a 5G has been among the best 5G phones since it launched late last year, offering a high-speed connectivity in a well-engineered package for less than $500. The Samsung Galaxy A52 5G looks to challenge that by offering far more hardware for the same — or even less — money.
- Check out more of our all-time inexpensive phones picks
- See the all-time Android phones for more than choices across a wider cost range
Although Samsung's telephone is arguably more generous with features, the Pixel notwithstanding offers a more refined experience in some areas. In this Samsung Milky way A52 5G vs. Google Pixel 4a 5G face-off, we've broken downwards how the phones compare in their fundamental areas, and tried to figure out which one is the overall best option for a upkeep phone heir-apparent.
Samsung Milky way A52 5G vs. Google Pixel 4a 5G: Specs
| Samsung Galaxy A52 5G | Google Pixel 4a 5G | |
| Starting price | $499/£399 | $499/£499 |
| Brandish | vi.v-inch FHD AMOLED (1080 x 2400) | six.2-inch FHD OLED (1080 10 2340) |
| Refresh rate | 60Hz/120Hz | 60Hz |
| Chipset | Snapdragon 750G | Snapdragon 765G |
| RAM | 6GB | 6GB |
| Storage | 128GB | 128GB |
| microSD | Yes, up to 1TB | No |
| Rear cameras | 64MP main (f/1.8), 12MP ultrawide (f/2.ii), 5MP macro (f/ii.2), 5MP depth sensor (f/2.2) | 12MP main (ƒ/one.7 ); 16MP ultra-wide (ƒ/2.2) |
| Front photographic camera | 32MP (f/2.2) | 8MP (ƒ/2.0) |
| Operating organization | Android 11 with One UI 3.0 | Android x/xi |
| Bombardment size | 4,500 mAh | iii,885 mAh |
| Charging speed | 25W wired | 18W wired |
| Water/dust resistance | IP67 | None; IP52 for Verizon version |
| Size | 6.three x ii.ix 10 0.3 inches (159.9 x 75.1 x 8.4mm) | 6.i x 2.9 x 0.three inches (153.ix x 74 x 8.2 mm) |
| Weight | six.7 ounces (189 grams) | 5.9 ounces (168 grams) |
Samsung Milky way A52 5G vs. Google Pixel 4a 5G: Price
Both the Galaxy A52 5G and Pixel 4a 5G sit at the upper end of the midrange market — not as expensive as flagship devices from Samsung and Google, just not as inexpensive as budget models.
British shoppers get a much meliorate bargain on the Galaxy A52 5G with costs $499/£399, with for its lonely model with 6GB of RAM and 128GB of storage. Those memory and storage specs are the aforementioned for the lone Google Pixel 4a 5G model, which costs $499/£499. (Verizon sells its own variant of the Pixel 4a 5G to work with its high-speed 5G network — that costs $599.) If you're a U.One thousand. customer, then, the Milky way A52 5G becomes the obvious option for being £100 cheaper than the Pixel. In the U.S., all the same, both phones toll exactly the same.
Winner: Samsung Galaxy A52 5G
Samsung Milky way A52 5G vs. Google Pixel 4a 5G: Design
Samsung and Google both opted for monochrome plastic shells for these phones. The Pixel 4a 5G but comes in black however, while the Galaxy A52 offers black plus brighter options similar blue, regal and white.
On the forepart, both phones use punch-pigsty cutouts in their displays to firm a single selfie cam. On the back, both phones likewise utilize foursquare photographic camera bumps, although the Samsung'due south cameras rise more than gradually from the back than the Pixel's practise, giving it a unique unmarried-piece look.
The back of the Pixel too features a fingerprint scanner. Samsung's phone uses an in-brandish fingerprint scanner instead.
Another practical point in the Samsung's favor is h2o/dust resistance. The Milky way A52 5G is IP67 rated, meaning information technology is totally dustproof and tin survive for 30 minutes under upward to 1 meter (iii feet and 3 inches) of water. While the Pixel 4a 5G does accept some waterproofing, it doesn't offer an official IP rating. The Pixel 4a 5G UW variant sold past Verizon is rated IP52, meaning information technology's effectively resistant to penetration by grit and dripping water. Nonetheless even that doesn't match upwardly to the Samsung's rating.
Winner: Samsung Galaxy A52 5G
Samsung Galaxy A52 5G vs. Google Pixel 4a 5G: Display
The Pixel 4a's screen is a vi.2-inch AMOLED panel with an FHD resolution and a 60Hz refresh rate. The Galaxy A52 as well features FHD resolution only blows the other specs abroad with a larger 6.five-inch brandish and a faster 120Hz refresh charge per unit.
After watching the new trailer for the Mortal Kombat movie, the A52 does perform amend, only simply subtly. Both phones display the flames, ice and environmental debris from the fight scenes with equally good detail and colour. The only thing the Galaxy A52 had in its favor was its increased size, but if the video had supported a college refresh charge per unit, the A52 would take been an piece of cake winner.
The A52 5G's screen did pick upwards some scratches in our time reviewing that phone, with the damage with frightening ease. Assuming that was a one-off problem, the Galaxy A52 5G is overall the better phone if you lot care about watching movies or playing games at their best.
Winner: Samsung Galaxy A52 5G
Samsung Galaxy A52 5G vs. Google Pixel 4a 5G: Cameras
The Milky way A52 packs double the number of rear cameras that the Pixel 4a 5G does. While the Pixel has 12MP primary and 16MP ultrawide lenses, the A52 counters with a 64MP main camera, a 12MP ultrawide camera, a 5MP macro photographic camera and a 5MP depth sensor.
Both phones use a single front photographic camera. In the Pixel's case information technology's an 8MP sensor, while the A52 uses a larger 32MP sensor.
Comparing shots captured past both phones reveals interesting differences in how the A52 and Pixel 4a 5G handle photography. For example, looking at the main sensors' take on this swimming scene shows how much brighter the images are from the Samsung's larger sensor.
Still that doesn't work so well when in low-light. The Pixel 4a uses Google's excellent Night Sight photography mode, which gives it a more than saturated epitome than the unappealing i the Samsung took of this pub.
The Pixel 4a 5G is much more effective when you employ its ultrawide angle lens. This prototype looking down from the elevation of Parliament Hill is brighter than the equivalent from the Samsung.
Turning to the front cameras on each phone, you might expect the larger camera on the Samsung to perform amend than the Pixel'southward smaller sensor. Any reward the extra megapixels offer is removed with portrait mode turned on still. With Google's software offering better saturation and a smoother texture to hide pores and stray hairs, the Pixel 4a 5G wins out again.
As note above, the Galaxy A52 packs some extra sensors y'all won't find on the Pixel 4a 5G, such as a macro camera. Sadly like many smartphone macro cameras, the A52's version doesn't take peculiarly good photos compared to its other sensors.
The depth sensor helps the A52 produce a meliorate-looking mistiness than the Pixel 4a 5G in this rear portrait manner shot. Although the Pixel's post-processing software is excellent, information technology can't compete with a dedicated sensor on the Samsung.
While the Galaxy A52 5G doesn't always pinnacle the Pixel 4a 5G in direct comparisons, the extra rear sensors give the A52 5G boosted versatility that helps brand the Pixel'south victory a narrow one.
Winner: Google Pixel 4a 5G
Samsung Galaxy A52 5G vs. Google Pixel 4a 5G: Performance
Samsung and Google take used similar silicon in their phones. The Galaxy A52 5G is equipped with the Snapdragon 750G, while the Pixel 4a 5G turns to the Snapdragon 765G. They both utilise the same amount of RAM besides: 6GB.
On benchmark tests, the phones trade blows, with the A52 offering ameliorate overall functioning co-ordinate to Geekbench five. Samsung's phone posted respective scores of 637 and ane,866 in the full general operation criterion'due south unmarried-core and multicore tests. The Pixel 4a 5G managed 598 and 1,614 scores on the same tests.
When it comes to graphics, though, the Pixel 4a 5G racked upwardly the better score on the 3D Sling Shot Farthermost Unlimited test, scoring ii,959 to the A52 5G'due south ii,875.
Arguably the A52 can make better use of its functioning thanks to its larger, higher refresh rate brandish. In terms of the numbers though, it's near enough a dead estrus.
Winner: Depict
Samsung Milky way A52 5G vs. Google Pixel 4a 5G: 5G connectivity
Each phone supports 5G. However Google has a key advantage.
In the the U.S., the Pixel 4a 5G comes in both sub-6GHz and mmWave versions of 5G (though the Pixel 4a 5G UW sold by Verizon does toll more than the version that uses sub-6GHz 5G). The A52 5G merely has sub-6GHz 5G in both the U.Due south. and U.K.
This distinction won't make a difference to U.Thou. customers, who don't have mmWave networks to connect to anyway, merely Verizon customers volition prefer the option of having a telephone that works on their network, even if they do have to pay a little more for it.
Winner: Google Pixel 4a 5G
Samsung Galaxy A52 5G vs. Google Pixel 4a 5G: Battery life and charging
The Pixel 4a 5G contains a 3,885 mAh battery, which lasted viii hours and 12 minutes on the Tom's Guide custom battery test. That's below the boilerplate fourth dimension of effectually ten hours, which is disappointing given how well the balance of the phone performs.
We haven't run our battery test on the Galaxy A52 still, but based on its larger iv,500 mAh bombardment, Samsung'due south phone has the potential to concluding longer than the Pixel 4a 5G. Only larger displays — particularly those with high refresh rates — can be a major power bleed, so using the A52 5G with its 120Hz style active may cause its battery life to driblet beneath that of the Pixel. Our testing will tell the tale.
For charging, the A52 5G comes out slightly ahead of the Pixel 4a 5G. Samsung bundles the telephone with a 25W charging brick. (That's a departure from the flagship Milky way S21 phones, which send without a charger.) The Pixel 4a 5G comes with an 18W brick.
That said, the Pixel charges faster, reaching 46% total afterwards 30 minutes. That comapres to 34% for the Galaxy A52 5G, though Samsung's phone has a larger battery, which skews the comparison somewhat. Accounting for capacities, the A52 5G charges most 14% faster than the Pixel.
Winner: Samsung Galaxy A52 5G
Samsung Milky way A52 5G vs. Google Pixel 4a 5G: Software
Samsung and Google both utilise Android, though they implement the software in very different ways on the Galaxy A52 5G and Pixel 4a 5G.
Google launched the Pixel 4a 5G with Android ten, but the phone has since been upgraded to Android 11. With Google phones getting three years of Android updates, we'd expect the Pixel 4a 5G to get both Android 12 this year too as an boosted update in 2022.
The Android experience on the Pixel 4a 5G is besides cleaner than what you lot'll experience with the Galaxy A52 5G, which layers Samsung's One UI 3.0 interface on top of Android 11. That ways a lot more custom visuals and many more than Samsung-fabricated apps alongside the born Google offerings, which makes for a much busier-looking interface.
If you're a long-time Samsung user, then having the company's custom apps is less likely to pose an issue for you. For the average user all the same, nosotros think the plainer interface of the Pixel 4a 5G is the more enjoyable to use.
Winner: Google Pixel 4a 5G
Samsung Milky way A52 5G vs. Google Pixel 4a 5G: Verdict
The Galaxy A52'south series of wins beyond a number of different categories propels it to a victory in our Samsung Galaxy A52 5G vs. Google Pixel 4a 5G face up-off. The Pixel 4a 5G performed well, simply offer less potent hardware seems to have sealed its identify as a runner-upward.
| Samsung Milky way A52 5G | Google Pixel 4a 5G | |
|---|---|---|
| Price (x points) | 8 | vii |
| Design (10 points) | 7 | six |
| Brandish (15 points) | 12 | 10 |
| Cameras (20 points) | 16 | 17 |
| Functioning (15 points) | 9 | ix |
| 5G (5 points) | 2 | 4 |
| Bombardment (15 points) | eleven | 9 |
| Software (10 points) | 8 | x |
| Overall (100 points) | 73 | 72 |
While the results bear witness an overall win for the Galaxy A52, the Pixel 4a 5G may still be the correct choice for some users. Its more than compact size and wider 5G compatibility in the U.S. are both potential good reasons to pick it instead of the A52. It also remains one of the best camera phones, though the gap with the Milky way A52 5G'due south photo-taking abilities is not as wide as you might retrieve.
The Samsung telephone is definitely the telephone to get in the U.G. where information technology's significantly cheaper. Pending the results of our battery examination, the Galaxy A52 5G as well looks like a better bet for a long-lasting device. And information technology's hard to overlook a fast-refreshing display in a phone that costs less than $500.
Source: https://www.tomsguide.com/face-off/samsung-galaxy-a52-5g-vs-google-pixel-4a-5g-whats-the-best-5g-phone-under-dollar500
Posted by: collinstergelet.blogspot.com
0 Response to "Samsung Galaxy A52 5G vs. Google Pixel 4a 5G: What’s the best 5G phone under $500?"
Post a Comment